Skip to content
AESTECHNO
Flutter · BLE · MQTT · IoT cold-chain

Mobile apps for IoT products, gateways, configuration, telemetry.

An industrial IoT product almost always needs a mobile app: initial configuration, field supervision, operator troubleshooting, telemetry uplink. We design these apps as technical tools, not marketing collateral, Flutter, robust BLE, MQTT to backend.

Expertise led by Hugues Orgitello, electronic-design engineer and founder of AESTECHNO Montpellier (10+ years of experience, certified CAP'TRONIC instructor).

Regulatory frameworks
  • Bluetooth 5.4
  • MQTT 5.0
  • TLS 1.3
  • Material Design 3
  • Apple HIG
  • GDPR

Flutter, the right tool for product apps

For a product app (configuration, supervision, telemetry of a sensor or machine), Flutter is currently the best choice: a single codebase for Android and iOS, near-native performance, a mature ecosystem for BLE and MQTT, simple deployment in-house or on the stores.

Our Flutter apps are written with Riverpod or Bloc for state management, with a clear UI / business logic separation, and unit + widget tests on critical functions. Long-term maintenance (OS updates, feature additions) stays smooth.

BLE, robust, for real

Bluetooth Low Energy is notoriously temperamental: connections that time out, services that change UUID after an update, sensor-side energy management that interrupts the session. A BLE app that works on the bench and breaks in the field is a classic.

Our approach: explicit BLE state machine (not implicit), handling of every transition (connect, disconnect, automatic reconnect, service loss), tests on 5+ different Android devices and 3+ iPhones (iOS and Android have different BLE bugs, both must pass). For cold-chain products where the BLE connection can last weeks, robustness isn't negotiable.

MQTT 5.0 to backend

MQTT 5.0 (the current version) adds important features for industrial IoT: Reason Codes (structured diagnostics), User Properties (extensible metadata), Shared Subscriptions (load balancing across backend instances), Session Expiry. We routinely use Mosquitto self-hosted, EMQX managed, or AWS IoT Core depending on client constraints.

On the mobile side, the MQTT client supports automatic reconnect, QoS 1/2 for critical messages, and offline buffering for connectivity dead zones (worksites, warehouses in coverage holes).

Industrial Android gateways, cold-chain and fleet

Typical use case: an operator on patrol scans BLE sensors as they pass nearby, the app collects the data and forwards it to an MQTT backend in the background. The phone is a gateway.

We've developed industrial Android apps dedicated to cold-chain (temperature sensors placed in refrigerated trucks, real-time cold-chain verification) and fleet management. Typical constraints: Android foreground service for continuous BLE collection, local SQLite store (outbox pattern) to withstand connectivity loss, fine-grained battery management, GDPR compliance for collected data.

Frequently asked questions

FAQ

Flutter or React Native?

For a product app with intensive BLE and client-side computation, Flutter has an edge in performance and stability. React Native is still relevant if the client team already has React skills. For a mostly UI-bound app without heavy constraints, both are fine. We avoid older frameworks (Cordova, Ionic) that have BLE limitations.

Can you publish on the App Store and Play Store?

Yes, full handling: signing, Apple profiles, store listing, version management, crash tracking (Sentry, Firebase Crashlytics). For internal apps (enterprise deployment), we also handle MDM (Mobile Device Management) and B2B signing. Count 2 to 4 weeks between final candidate and first published version.

What's the typical duration of an IoT app project?

For a complete product app (provisioning + supervision + telemetry), count 4 to 8 months depending on complexity. UX specification phase takes 2-4 weeks. Initial development 3-5 months. Real-device testing and BLE stabilization 1-2 months. Evolutionary maintenance is a separate item that can stretch over several years.

What our clients say

Très bonne collaboration avec AESTECHNO ! Une équipe à la fois sympathique, efficace, flexible et réactive. Leur expertise, aussi bien en conception électronique, qu'en développement logiciel et mise au point système, a été un véritable atout pour la réussite du projet. Je recommande sans réserve.

Fabien Reversat , Technical Director · Exavision
Related expertise